Better Weighing Performance: 6 Easy Steps
Guide

Better Weighing Performance In 6 Easy Steps

Guide

Get Your Results Right the First Time

Better Weighing Performance: Select the right precision balance and improve your analytical process efficiency. Save time and money with new checklist.
Better Weighing Performance: Select the right precision balance and improve your analytical process efficiency. Save time and money with new checklist.

Getting your weighing results right the first time is crucial, as it saves you time and money and eliminates the need for rework. Errors caused by inaccurate weighing results, or an error in recording the weighing result cause problems because they are often difficult or impossible to trace.

Very often it is small things that can improve the weighing performance of your balance. This checklist highlights the key considerations when choosing and working with laboratory top-load balances and explains how to:

  • Select the right balance;
  • Determine suitable position for installation and use;
  • Assure accuracy through calibration;
  • Ensure accurate results every day;
  • Improve process efficiency and save time, and
  • Keep your balance clean.

The checklist focuses on laboratory precision balances and describes simple rules that will help you to assess weighing accuracy and keep analytical results right.

 

Chapter 4: How to ensure accurate results every day

in-between calibrations, measuring equipment must be checked regularly to ensure ongoing balance performance. The user should perform these routine tests at fixed time intervals.

 

Checklist questions

If you answered “No” to any of the above questions, you may benefit from reviewing and revising your SOPs to include or improve your ongoing balance testing. To learn more about routine testing and how to implement it, review the following section.

Put Periodic Testing into Practice

Accurate weighing - How to select the right weighing instrument and perform the right testing?

Periodic routine testing using external weights helps for two reasons:
1. Within the calibration period, performance changes can occur. A routine test is a quick and traceable check that the balance still performs within the defined process tolerances.
2. The frequency of routine testing should be based on the risk the weighing application brings into the process, and can vary from daily (for risky applications), over weekly, monthly to yearly.

 Sensitivity

Sensitivity assessment should be carried out most frequently of all routine tests, since it is an integral part of the functional control of a measurement device, and it is also quick and simple. Sensitivity is measured by using a calibrated test weight close to 100% of the balance capacity.
For balances with an activated built-in adjustment feature, sensitivity tests with external weights can be carried out less frequently.

Repeatability

The assessment of repeatability is carried out less frequently as sensitivity, however, it is an important property when weighing small samples, and hence, is relevant for the determination of the minimum weight. Repeatability is usually measured by performing 10 replicate weighings under the same conditions using a test weight close to 5% of the balance capacity.

 

Thank you for visiting www.mt.com. We have tried to optimize your experience while on the site, but we noticed that you are using an older version of a web browser. We would like to let you know that some features on the site may not be available or may not work as nicely as they would on a newer browser version. If you would like to take full advantage of the site, please update your web browser to help improve your experience while browsing www.mt.com.